There are 21 water bodies in this operational catchment, multiple small rivers and brooks lead into the Stour Estuary. The four main water bodies are named after the four main bodies of water, although do contain other named bodies of water: Stutton Brook, Holbrook, Wrabness Brook and Ramsey River.
The River Stour is 47 miles long, it rises to the west of Great Bradley in Cambridgeshire and for the most part forms the county boundary between Suffolk and Essex. From its source it flows east to Haverhill, Clare, Sudbury, Nayland, Stratford St Mary and Dedham, becoming tidal just before Manningtree and joining the North Sea at Harwich. The Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) stretches upstream from Manningtree to within 1 mile of Bures. The Stour is navigable from Cattawade to Brundon Mill. The Stour valley retains a rural landscape with rich diversity of wildlife and habitat as painted by the artists Constable and Gainsborough.
This catchment consists of the Upper River Stour, which is split into 2 parts (Upper Stour and Upper Stour upstream of Lamarsh), Chad Brook, Lower Glem, Upper Glem, Chilton Brook, Belchamp Brook, Stour Brook and Bumpstead Brook. Upper Stour and Upper Stour upstream of Lamarsh are the main water bodies within the catchment and the others are tributaries that flow into the Upper Stour apart from the upper Glem which flows into the Lower Glem.
This catchment also includes the Lower River Stour (split into 2 sections; Lower River Stour downstream of Lamarsh and Lower River Stour), River Box, Lavenham Brook, River Brett, Old River Brett and Bildeston Brook. Lavenham Brook flows into River Brett and the River Brett flows into Lower River Stour. Both Old River Brett and Bildeston Brook flow into the Lavenham Brook/River Brett area and the River Box is another tributary of the River Stour.
The Stour Estuary is a designated Ramsar Wetland of International Importance, Special Protection Area (SPA) and Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). The estuary consists of extensive mudflats, low cliffs, saltmarsh, and areas of vegetated shingle on the lower river reaches. The site supports internationally and nationally important numbers of numerous species of wintering wildfowl and waders. Several nationally scarce plants and invertebrates occur.
The pressures for this waterbody are divided into categories: Diffuse Pollution, Fish Passage, Flow, Invasive Species, Physical Modification, and Point Source . Please click here to view these pressure descriptions in more detail.
There are multiple structures in this waterbody which prevent fish movement. There is a 1.7km stretch beyond the reservoir where the fish population has become completely isolated over the last 10 years. Isolated populations are often more susceptible to disease and other pressures.
Flow is heavily impacted in this waterbody because of two main factors. One is the impoundment of water at Alton Reservoir. The second is a flood protection structure which also affects the natural flow of water. The reduced flow means that the dissolved oxygen content in this waterbody is at poor status.
A combination of all of the previous pressures, and the general maintenance of the river, means that the morphology of this river is classified as moderate.
There are multiple barriers in this waterbody which are preventing fish movement. There were lower than expected populations of fish in this waterbody when it was surveyed, this was especially true for roach, chub and dace.
This waterbody has a relatively low flow which could be due to the groundwater abstraction that takes place locally. This low flow could be having an impact on fish and invertebrate populations, but there are uncertainties about how much of an impact this low flow may be having.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as poor. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Diatom populations also indicate higher than optimum pollution levels.
Fish populations on this stretch of river have decreased and numbers are lower than expected. This is likely to be because of maintenance activities on the river that have reduced habitat availability and prevented fish from being able to inhabit the whole stretch of river. The maintenance includes dredging which is usually done to protect properties from flooding.
There is currently no information on how this river flows, although the hydrology at the site has been classed as moderate.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as poor. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Diatom populations also indicate higher than optimum pollution levels.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
There are a few structures on this waterbody which may impact on some fish and their ability to migrate along the river.
Himalayan Balsam has been most recently recorded on this water body in 2013 . This pretty plant, with pink flowers, is fast growing and hardy. It covers river banks and shades out native plants. In the winter, Himalayan Balsam will die down, leaving bare banks that are susceptible to erosion.
There are a range of physical structures on this waterbody including flood protection structures, a mill and other barriers. These physical structures are contributing to the lower than expected fish populations that are seen in this waterbody.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as poor. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as poor. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
Phosphate levels in this waterbody are currently classified as poor. This phosphate is likely to be coming from diffuse agricultural sources.
Signal Crayfish have been most recently recorded on this water body in 2003, 2005 and 2014. Signal Crayfish cause changes to the natural bankside habitat and also out-compete our native crayfish. They are fierce predators and can completely change fish and invertebrate communities so that they are no longer in their natural state.
The invasive signal crayfish are present in this waterbody.
Phosphate levels are also impacted by the local sewage treatment works which discharges into this waterbody.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate, ammonia and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses.
The invasive signal crayfish are present in this waterbody. The signal crayfish are likely to be causing problems for invertebrates which have fluctuated between moderate and good status. Before 2011, this site held a healthy population of white-clawed crayfish which were unfortunately lost to crayfish plague.
Channel maintenance activities often reduce river bed and margin habitats.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate, ammonia and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate, ammonia and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses.
This river stretch, along with many others in this catchment, has been historically modified.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate, ammonia and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses.
Signal Crayfish have been most recently recorded on this water body in 2000 . Signal Crayfish cause changes to the natural bankside habitat and also out-compete our native crayfish. They are fierce predators and can completely change fish and invertebrate communities so that they are no longer in their natural state.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. There are several consented sewage discharges along this waterbody, including one major sewage treatment works.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses.
Channel maintenance activities often reduce river bed and margin habitats. This river stretch, along with many others in this catchment, has been historically modified.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. There are several consented sewage discharges along this waterbody, including one major sewage treatment works.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as poor. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Diatom populations also indicate higher than optimum pollution levels.
This river has been historically altered and this means that there are many barriers to fish migration. Removal of these barriers would not necessarily allow the fish populations to recover and would also incur high costs
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as poor. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Diatom populations also indicate higher than optimum pollution levels.
This waterbody is surrounded by mainly arable fields; the run off from these fields often contains a range of pollutants including phosphate.
Flood protection via a pumping station at this site has an impact on the flow within the waterbody. This reduction in flow causes real problems with dissolved oxygen levels in the water.
There is a problem with Carp in this waterbody. The carp are contributing to the reduced dissolved oxygen levels.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
Turkish Crayfish have been most recently recorded on this water body in 2006, 2007 and 2009. Turkish Crayfish cause changes to the natural bankside habitat and also out-compete our native crayfish. They are fierce predators and can completely change fish and invertebrate communities so that they are no longer in their natural state.
Giant Hogweed has been most recently recorded on this water body in 2012. This plant has been in the news a lot more recently due to the horrific burns that its sap can give the skin. This invasive plant is so large that it is able to shade out other native plants.
American Mink have been most recently recorded on this water body in 2010 . American Mink cause a wide range of problems on a river, including playing a large part in the local extinction of many natural species such as water voles and kingfishers.
Signal Crayfish have been most recently recorded on this water body in 2000, 2007, 2009, 2013. Signal Crayfish cause changes to the natural bankside habitat and also out-compete our native crayfish. They are fierce predators and can completely change fish and invertebrate communities so that they are no longer in their natural state
Physical modification
This river stretch, along with many others in this catchment, has been historically modified.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
Models have shown that there is likely to be issues with the hydrology in this waterbody.
Himalayan Balsam has been most recently recorded on this water body in 2012. This pretty plant, with pink flowers, is fast growing and hardy. It covers river banks and shades out native plants. In the winter, Himalayan Balsam will die down, leaving bare banks that are susceptible to erosion.
This river stretch, along with many others in this catchment, has been historically modified.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as poor. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. This waterbody also has problems with its invertebrate populations; this may be linked to the high phosphate levels.
Multiple physical structures cause barriers to fish, this includes a section of water impoundment.
Multiple physical structures and a lack of in-channel vegetation have caused un-natural flows. This could be having a negative impact on the biology of the waterbody.
Giant Hogweed has been most recently recorded on this water body in 2015. This plant has been in the news a lot more recently due to the horrific burns that its sap can give the skin. This invasive plant is so large that it is able to shade out other native plants.
Turkish Crayfish have been most recently recorded on this water body in 2007, 2009, 2011 and 2015. Turkish Crayfish cause changes to the natural bankside habitat and also out-compete our native crayfish. They are fierce predators and can completely change fish and invertebrate communities so that they are no longer in their natural state.
A range of measures have previously been put in place for this waterbody, to improve the bankside vegetation, remove hard bank reinforcements, increase channel diversity and remove structures. These measures have not been taken forward.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as poor. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. This waterbody also has problems with its invertebrate populations; this may be linked to the high phosphate levels.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses.
This waterbody has developed problems with both phosphate and dissolved oxygen levels which both contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. Reduced oxygen levels are often common in summer months because of reduced river flows, higher water temperatures, increased oxygen demand due to increased biological activity and higher effluent proportions in watercourses.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. This waterbody also has problems with its invertebrate populations; this may be linked to the high phosphate levels.
This river stretch, along with many others in this catchment, has been historically modified.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from. This waterbody also has problems with its invertebrate populations; this may be linked to the high phosphate levels.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately, there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
This river has been historically altered and this means that there are many barriers to fish migration. Removal of these barriers would not necessarily allow the fish populations to recover and would also incur high costs.
This waterbody has developed problems with phosphate levels which contribute to its overall rating as moderate. Unfortunately, there is no data to suggest where these problems are originating from.
There is no data due to a lack of water testing and investigation within this waterbody.
There is no data due to a lack of biological monitoring within this waterbody.
The flow on this waterbody has been classed as moderate. The reason for this classification is due to groundwater abstraction that takes place within this waterbody.
There is no data due to a lack of biological monitoring within this waterbody.
This waterbody has been modified historically which means that it is classified as moderate under this category.
There is no data due to a lack of water testing and investigation within this waterbody.
Subscribe to the Essex Rivers Hub newsletter to hear about our latest work and project updates from the catchment partnership.
Website designed and developed by Studio Seventeen Ltd.
The topics below represent the pressures that many waterbodies in the Combined Essex catchment face. They have been divided into six main categories, but it is quite often that these categories can overlap as pressures relate to each other.
Diffuse pollution occurs as water moves across the land or through the ground and picks pollutants. These pollutants can come from a variety of places, including urban and field run off. The pollutants that enter the river can range from sediment to toxins to excess nutrients, meaning that diffuse pollution can cause a whole range of different issues. The variety in these pressure groups means that it is something that can be quite difficult to tackle. It requires groups of people, business and stakeholders to work together in order to solve this problem.
Fish should be able to travel up and down a river freely, allowing them to move and breed in the most suitable habitats for them. It is important that fish populations do not become isolated, as this makes them more susceptible to disease and puts pressure on their survival. Unfortunately, there are often many barriers along rivers that prevent fish from being able to migrate up and down stream. Where barriers have been identified, they will be seen as a ‘pressure’ on a waterbody. Thankfully, there are many solutions now that can be put in place to aid fish passage, even over large barriers.
The flow in a river can vary greatly throughout the year as rainfall and run off can have an effect. This is a natural process. It is when flow is impacted by non-natural processes that it can cause problems. Sometimes, water can be intercepted or removed from a system; this will reduce the flow, therefore changing the habitat conditions. Some species are happy in high energy rivers. This means that when flow is reduced, these species will no longer survive. The opposite of this can occur when excess water is entering a river, for example through increased runoff. Low energy systems then become high energy and displace the species that live there.
A species that is not meant to be found in a particular area is known as an invasive species. Invasive species can be from a different habitat or a different country altogether. Most of the invasive species that we find on our rivers have come from other countries – plants that people have imported for their gardens or animals that have been released for food or by animal rights activists. Control of invasive species requires a lot of time and effort. We are fortunate that we do have a range of methods to manage most of the invasive species that cause havoc on our rivers, but there are still some which we are still struggling to control.
Many of our rivers have been heavily modified over the years as rivers have been used for a wide range of purposes. Physical modification is one of the biggest factors that causes our rivers to be unhealthy. The issues that it can cause range from reducing habitat, preventing migration of mobile species, and even have an effect on the water quality. Where structures and modifications are no longer in use or necessary, they should be removed to allow the river to regain its natural state. Unfortunately, this action is not always taken which means that many of our rivers are over straightened and contain redundant structures. It is possible to return a lot of our rivers to their natural state, through one off projects, but in other cases it is not possible as the river has been changed to protect assets or manage flooding. It is recognised that some modifications cannot be removed without having severe negative impacts both socially and economically.
This is pollution that comes from a single identifiable source. The pollution entering the river could include a whole range of pollutants. Some point source pollution is known about and licences, for example sewage treatment works. Other sources are not licensed, and therefore work needs to be done with landowners to fix the problems that are allowing the pollution to enter the river. Point source pollution is more easily controlled than diffuse pollution as it often only takes one management approach to solve the issue.